Most people wouldn't even bother to ask the question: they simply 'take it as read' that they do. Because, after all, we've been told and educated that they do... by science... by doctors... for decades... for at least over a century now.
So what would you think if someone told you that viruses may not... or even do not... exist?
What would you say?
Would you immediately think whoever is saying this must be mad? stupid? crazy?
Or would you take the time to listen to the arguments which are currently being made by a group of doctors and scientists, saying that viruses have never been proven to exist.
It's important to remember that new information about life comes to light all the time, overturning previous knowledge.
For example, most people in 'first world' countries have been brought up to think that medication or surgery are the answer for illness, without asking why the symptoms are there in the first place.
As we delve deeper, we discover that the body has innate healing abilities, and that if we can work out the root causes, and eliminate those root causes (aka pull the roots of the plant out, rather than just trimming the leaves) then the body can often restore itself to good health without medication or surgery.*
And what about the scientists who were adamant that the sun revolved around the world?
What happened when Galileo insisted instead that the world moves around the sun?
People said he was crazy, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment by the inquisition for his support of the Copernican theory that the sun was at the center of the solar system*.
And here's another thought to ponder on:
If you are diagnosed by a medical doctor with a bacterial infection, you are given antibiotics.
But when you are diagnosed with a viral infection, you are pretty much told 'there's nothing we (the medical profession) can do, there are no anti-viral medications - go home and rest, you should come right in a few days'.
And mostly we do (get better).
Does this have anything to do with the potential fact that viruses may not actually exist?
I cannot write a blog about viruses without mentioning a commonly misunderstood fact that I came to properly understand over 20 years ago, and have seen to be true over and over again ever since:
For many years I've been helping people get well from seemingly impossible-to-get-well-from illnesses, such as CFS (chronic fatigue), fibromyalgia, EBV (Epstein Barr Virus), Glandular Fever, PVFS (post viral fatigue syndrome), many of which are attributed to being caused by a virus.
The reason people think a 'virus' is the cause of their symptoms and also the reason for not getting well, is because their symptoms usually come on or get worse after the 'virus' sets in - which means after they come down with a fever, sore throat and are bedridden for a few days.
Most doctors will usually tell them 'there's nothing we can do for a virus, go home and rest'.
However, as we discover upon a thorough root cause analysis, the 'virus' is just the end-result and final straw of many preceding stresses and strains on the body. Finally, after months and years of ongoing unresolved unaddressed stress, the body breaks down, and people get sick with a so-called 'virus'. In other words, the virus is not the cause of the symptoms, merely the point in time that the body breaks down under prolonged stress.
In every single root cause analysis I have done in 16+ years, the root cause of the symptoms is found never to be the 'virus', (whether a so-called 'virus' exists or not). The real root cause is the emotional-trauma-environmental-stress damage inflicted on the body for months and years before the 'virus' (high temperature, sore throat etc etc) manifested.
The reason people stay sick and experience long-term pain and fatigue (as in the conditions labelled above) is due to the fact that the original cause has not yet been properly identified, understood and addressed. When clients are guided and helped to do this, they get well, and often in a relatively short time***.
According to Dr Brian Ardis and Dr Andrew Kaufmann, two exponents of 'Terrain Theory', the real meaning of the word virus is 'poison', coming from the latin 'virus, meaning poison, slime or venom'.** Accordingly the virus is seen more as toxic effluence being discarded from the cells, a natural cleansing and detoxification process.
Dr Mark Bailey has recently written a paper 'Farewell to Virology' in which he describes his reasoning behind why viruses do not exist.
One of the places to listen to some of the best discussions on the topic is the 'End of Covid' online documentary summit, where you can listen to many indepth discussions specifically geared to the layperson about viruses, virus isolation, genomes, electron microscopy and more.
At the end of the day, you need to do your own research, and discover what is true. Gone are the days of 'doctor knows best'. It's time for people to take control of their health and wellbeing, and understand their bodies from the inside out. There is more than enough information on the planet for this to happen now.
It's also important to remember that we the public have been fed many lies for a long time now when it comes to health****. Is the virus story part of this deception? Time will tell.
And of course most importantly, if it's true that virues do not exist, and that the Covid virus has never been isolated, where does that leave us in regards to the past 3 years?
These are big questions to ask, and sooner or later, I hope, the truth will prevail.
* For more information about private root cause analysis sessions and practitioner trainings, please see www.artofhealth.co.nz
* https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/galileo-is-accused-of-heresy
** Etymology of virus (see description below)
*** https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
*** Success stories of recovering from weird and wonderful 'viruses' and other illnesses https://www.kimknighthealth.com/success-stories/
**** See the 'True History of Medicine'
late 14c., "poisonous substance" (a sense now archaic), from Latin virus "poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice," from Proto-Italic *weis-o-(s-) "poison," which is probably from a PIE root *ueis-, perhaps originally meaning "to melt away, to flow," used of foul or malodorous fluids, but with specialization in some languages to "poisonous fluid" (source also of Sanskrit visam "venom, poison," visah "poisonous;" Avestan vish- "poison;" Latin viscum "sticky substance, birdlime;" Greek ios "poison," ixos "mistletoe, birdlime;" Old Church Slavonic višnja "cherry;" Old Irish fi "poison;" Welsh gwy "poison").
The meaning "agent that causes infectious disease" emerged by 1790s gradually out of the earlier use in reference to venereal disease (by 1728); the modern scientific use dates to the 1880s. The computer sense is from 1972. VIRUS (among Physicians) a kind of watery stinking Matter, which issues out of Ulcers, being endued with eating and malignant Qualities. [Bailey's dictionary, 1770].
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.